Can We Avoid The ‘Fiscal Cliff’?
The White House and Republican leaders have entered the final month of “fiscal cliff” negotiations, trying to compromise on a way to raise revenues and cut spending to avoid an automatic $700 billion in budgetary cuts that could push the nation back into recession.
There’s no responsible way we can govern this country at a time of enormous threat, and risk, and challenge, uncertainty, millions of Americans retiring, huge levels of poverty, inequality, huge under-investment in education and infrastructure, with those low rates in place for future generations. Those rates are going to have to go up.
The Republicans disagree. They’re open to closing loopholes and ending deductions, but not raising tax rates. House Speaker John Boehner appeared on “Fox News Sunday” and said:
We’ve put a serious offer on the table by putting revenues up there to try to get this question resolved. But the White House has responded with virtually nothing.
What looks like a game of political brinksmanship in Washington could have huge consequences on states like Massachusetts and cities like Boston. We speak with local experts about what’s at stake, how we got here, and how we might pull back from the “cliff.”
- Mickey Edwards, vice president of the Aspen Institute, former U.S. congressman for Oklahoma and author of “The Parties Versus The People: How To Turn Republicans And Democrats Into Americans“
- Linda Bilmes, senior lecturer in public policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, former Assistant Secretary of Commerce and author of “The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost Of The Iraq Conflict”
- Cognoscenti: Three Ways To Avoid Future ‘Fiscal Cliffs’
- Pick A Number: Let’s Play ‘Cap Those Deductions’
- The Origin Of The Term ‘Fiscal Cliff’
Other stories from this show:
WBUR's Sacha Pfeiffer is co-hosting Radio Boston while Meghna Chakrabarti is on maternity leave.
- Listen: Weekdays, 3 p.m. on 90.9 FM
- Live Call-In: (800) 423-TALK
- Listener Voicemail: (617) 358-0607