Copyright And The Public Commons

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00_eluqZ1mY

Remember The Chiffon’s 1962 hit “He’s So Fine”?

Even if you don’t know the song, it would probably sound familiar. That’s because George Harrison’s “My Sweet Lord,” released a few years later, sounds an awful lot like it. In fact, the two sound so much alike that in 1976 a judge ruled Harrison had violated The Chiffons’ copyright over the tune, and George Harrison eventually ended up having to pay for its use.

Copyrights and usage fees aren’t exclusive to the recording industry. Books, obviously, carry them. But television commercials, pieces of genetic code, even the speeches of Martin Luther King are protected under copyright. If you want to use them, you have to ask permission, and in many cases you’re liking going to have to pay up.

"Common as Air" by Lewis Hyde

"Common as Air" by Lewis Hyde

In his new book, “Common As Air: Revolution Art and Ownership“, author Lewis Hyde argues the practice has gotten dangerously out of hand. He says the over-copyrighting of intellectual property has encroached on a different, more important kind of property: the public commons — that communal wealth of knowledge built up over generations of discovery and invention.

Guest:

  • Lewis Hyde, a fellow at the Berkman Center For Internet And Society; author, “Common as Air”
  • Don

    Maybe we should be looking for new economic models for intellectual inventions and discoveries.

    For software, users, esp. corporate users but also individuals, could form groups to commission software. The developers would sell the software development services instead of licenses. The software would be free and open source, so that the users could take it anyway for bug fixes and enhancements.

  • Marian dioguardi

    PLEASE make the distinction between patents and copyrights. They are very different. Do not use them interchangeably .

  • Norah

    As a professional permissions specialist, I’d obviously be concerned about what a loosening of copyright law would do for my own bottom line. But I’ve also worked on scholarly journals for which revenue from reprint permissions outweighed subscription revenue. You could make the argument, in those cases, that copyright protection is what enabled the journal to function–and those ideas to be circulated in that forum–in the first place.

Hosts Meghna Chakrabarti and Anthony Brooks introduce us to newsmakers, big thinkers and artists and bring us stories of relevance to Bostonians here and around the region. Live every weekday at 3.

  • Listen: Weekdays, 3 p.m. on 90.9 FM
  • Live Call-In: (800) 423-TALK
  • Listener Voicemail: (617) 353-1137
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari